Richard Clode | Janus Henderson
As ever, NVIDIA (NASDAQ: NVDA) founder and CEO Jensen Huang is very aware of the market concerns centred around companies overspending on the AI infrastructure build out and sought to address them head on during the earnings call. The company also plans to provide more detail on its latest Blackwell Ultra, Rubin and Vera chips, as well as a host of other new innovations at its next generation roadmap at GTC, NVIDIA’s AI and tech conference in March, as the company looks to break the stock out of an eight-month digestion period.
Here we summarise 4 key highlights from the earnings call:
After significant angst around a problematic initial ramp of a very complex and inaugural rack level system, the company delivered US$11 billion of Blackwell sales last quarter (ending 26 January 2025) well ahead of guidance of ‘several billion’. For context, 350 plants are producing the 1.5 million components in each single Blackwell rack. A more aggressive supply ramp through 2025 to meet ‘extraordinary’ demand for Blackwell can be expected.
Test time scaling and the advent of reasoning models is a major new exponential vector for AI infrastructure spending. Long think reasoning can be 100 times more compute intensive versus standard one-shot inferencing. That is the first generation, with the possibility of subsequently more thoughtful reasoning models that could be hundreds of thousands or millions of times more compute intensive. The more the model thinks, the more compute processing it does, the more accurate and intelligent the answer.
NVIDIA has delivered a 200 times reduction in inferencing costs in just two years. DeepSeek was just the latest iteration of AI innovation that is driving down the cost of this new technology. Far from reducing demand for AI infrastructure, Jevon’s Paradox means we are experiencing the opposite, as we have witnessed during prior technology cost down curves in the PC and internet eras.
Broadcom’s ASIC chips are designed for single purpose tasks and are also cheaper versus NVIDIA’s GPUs which are general purpose, being able to handle multiple tasks like AI training, image and video rendering, and gaming. As such, ASIC has emerged as a challenger to NVIDIA GPUs.
NVIDIA’s CEO made the point that the main data centre bottleneck is power supply, hence customers want to maximise the revenue potential of each data centre. The way to do that in an AI world is to maximise the number of tokens generated per watt. NVIDIA currently leads the way by a factor of 2-8 times versus the competition. Its general-purpose processors can multi-task, including handling the significantly greater complexity of AI software, which can be a challenge when operating multiple underlying hardware.
We believe generative AI is not just a theme. The complexity of a major new technology wave and a ‘winner takes most’ industry requires bottom-up fundamental research and active management to identify the key beneficiaries who can exhibit underappreciated earnings growth in this highly innovative and disruptive investment landscape.
Note: source of all NVIDIA earnings information as at 26 February 2025:
All prices and analysis at 28 February 2025. This document was originally published on Livewire Markets website on 28 February 2025. This information has been prepared by Janus Henderson Investors (Australia) Funds Management Limited ABN 43 164 177 244 AFSL 444268.The content is distributed by WealthHub Securities Limited (WSL) (ABN 83 089 718 249)(AFSL No. 230704). WSL is a Market Participant under the ASIC Market Integrity Rules and a wholly owned subsidiary of National Australia Bank Limited (ABN 12 004 044 937)(AFSL No. 230686) (NAB). NAB doesn’t guarantee its subsidiaries’ obligations or performance, or the products or services its subsidiaries offer. This material is intended to provide general advice only. It has been prepared without having regard to or taking into account any particular investor’s objectives, financial situation and/or needs. All investors should therefore consider the appropriateness of the advice, in light of their own objectives, financial situation and/or needs, before acting on the advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Any comments, suggestions or views presented do not reflect the views of WSL and/or NAB. Subject to any terms implied by law and which cannot be excluded, neither WSL nor NAB shall be liable for any errors, omissions, defects or misrepresentations in the information or general advice including any third party sourced data (including by reasons of negligence, negligent misstatement or otherwise) or for any loss or damage (whether direct or indirect) suffered by persons who use or rely on the general advice or information. If any law prohibits the exclusion of such liability, WSL and NAB limit its liability to the re-supply of the information, provided that such limitation is permitted by law and is fair and reasonable. For more information, please click here.