Important Information:

Some site functionality will be unavailable between 01:00 and 09:00 on Sunday 28th of July for scheduled maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Howard marks on where to now

Graham Hand unpicks the famous fund manager’s thoughts for investors.

Howard Marks wrote his previous memo to clients of Oaktree Capital on 19 March 2020, and on Wednesday this week, he issued another one. It's a sign of how quickly the market is changing as he usually writes only once every couple of months.

In the space of 11 days, he seems far more worried. Previously, he wrote:

"Given the price drops and selling we've seen so far, I believe this is a good time to invest, although of course it may prove not (to) have been the best time. No one can argue that you should spend all your money today ... but equally, no one can argue that you shouldn't spend any. The more you want to garner potential gains and don't mind mark-to-market losses, the more you should invest here."

 

What's his latest view?

In his latest memo, he describes the 'quickest meltdown' in US stock market history, a fall of 34% in little over a month. It was followed by a gain of 17%, the best three-day rise since the 1930s. Amid the turmoil, 106 companies issued an unbelievable $213 bllion of investment grade bonds in a month, another record.

After his decades in the business, Marks is as well placed as anyone to assess the outlook. In his latest views, he catalogues the optimistic and pessimistic views, and reaches a vital conclusion. He starts with:

"It’s important to take time out for a serious discussion of possible scenarios. Are this past week’s remedies certain to work? Are the prior week’s negatives really erased? Which will win in the short and intermediate term: the disease, economic ramifications or Fed/Treasury actions?"

He then divides the arguments into the positive and negative cases.

 

Positive outlook

1. The virus will be brought under control within three months or so. He says every forecast makes the assumption that isolation, immunity, warmer weather, treatments and a vaccine will flatten and turn down the curve.

2. The negative impact of the disease on the economy will be sharp but brief. The V-shaped recovery assumes a big hit to earnings initially but an even stronger recovery within a short time, probably as little as three months.

3. The government will provide life support to the economy during a lockdown-induced coma and then bring the patient out of the coma after the cure has been effected. Recovery will be helped by improving news on the disease.

 

Negative outlook

Marks admits he's more of a worrier than a dreamer, with his personal defensive tendencies leading him to find more negatives than positives.

1. He is very worried about the outlook for the disease, especially in the U.S, and believes the headlines on infections and deaths will become much worse. 

"The success of other countries in slowing the disease has been a function of widespread social distancing, testing and temperature-taking to identify those who are infected, and quarantining them from everyone else. The U.S. is behind in all these regards. Testing is rarely available, mass temperature-taking is non-existent, and people wonder whether large-scale quarantining is legal."

2. The economy will contract at a record rate, millions will be out of work, company earnings will collapse, and there may even be food shortages. He questions how realistic the V-shape recovery argument is.

"I believe we’re likely to see defaults on the part of leveraged entities, based on price markdowns, ratings downgrades and perhaps defaults on their portfolio assets; increased 'haircuts' on the part of lenders (i.e., reduced amounts loaned against a dollar of collateral); and margin calls, portfolio liquidations and forced selling."

3. It will be challenging to resolve the conflict between social isolation and economic recovery. He repeats the point made by President Trump in asking whether the disease merits the severity of the cure. The longer lockdowns continue, the harder it be for the economy to recover. If a decline in new coronavirus cases leads to a resumption of activity, a second wave of infection could hit.

4. In addition to the disease and its economic repercussions, there is a specific impact of the low oil prices on energy companies.

"Due to a confluence of reduced consumption and a price war between Saudi Arabia and Russia, the price of oil has fallen from $61 per barrel at year-end to $19 today."

He then adds negative psychology, fear of more problems and the negative wealth effects to his list of worries. He is even concerned whether enough businesses will continue operating during a lockdown:

"The Treasury can make up for people’s lost wages, but people need the things wages buy. So replacing lost wages and revenues will not be enough for long: the economy has to produce goods and services."

 

Summing up

He makes an important conclusion, saying if it's not too late, investors should increase defensiveness in their portfolios. He says:

"In the Global Financial Crisis, I worried about a downward cascade of financial news, and about the implications for the economy of serial bankruptcies among financial institutions. But everyday life was unchanged from what it had been, and there was no obvious threat to life and limb.

Today the range of negative outcomes seems much wider, as described above. Social isolation, disease and death, economic contraction, enormous reliance on government action, and uncertainty about the long-term effects are all with us, and the main questions surround how far they will go.

Nevertheless, the market prices of assets have responded to the events and outlook (in a very micro sense, I feel last week’s bounce reflected too much optimism, but that’s me). I would say assets were priced fairly on Friday for the optimistic case but didn’t give enough scope for the possibility of worsening news. Thus my reaction to all the above is to expect asset prices to decline. You may or may not feel there’s still time to increase defensiveness ahead of potentially negative developments. But the most important thing is to be ready to respond to and take advantage of declines."

 

Howard Marks is Co-founder and Co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management, the largest investor in distressed securities worldwide. This article is general information and does not consider the circumstances of all investors.

A full copy of his latest client memo is linked here.
  

nabtrade is a sponsor of the financial newsletter, Firstlinks, and nabtrade clients can subscribe  here.

 


About the Author
Graham Hand , Firstlinks

Graham Hand has over 40 years of experience in financial markets, including Group Treasurer and Managing Director Treasury roles at major banks. He ran a financial consultancy business for many years before spending a decade in wealth management at Colonial First State. In 2012, Graham was the Co-Founder (with Chris Cuffe) and Managing Editor of Cuffelinks, now Firstlinks, a leading financial newsletter with 80,000 Monthly Active Users. Morningstar acquired Firstlinks in October 2019 and Graham is now Editorial Director at Morningstar. Graham has written extensively for major financial publications, and two of his books, one on the banking system and one a novel, have been published.